I wish today’s crop of reporters knew enough to use words properly.
It’s bad enough that the news itself is considered emotionally–charged entertainment instead of information, but that’s for railing about later. Today I’m annoyed with the misuse of words by people who really ought to know better.
Specifically, it’s the word pristine. It means in its primitive state, pure, untouched, unsullied.
The most recent offence is some undeveloped land along the North Saskatchewan River in Edmonton. It was described on the evening news as “pristine.”
It’s been used for recreation for quite some time. It’s a stretch to call it untouched.
By far the worst offence ever was back in the early 1990s. A print reporter wrote “pristine farmland.”
I am painfully aware of the chance I’m taking writing about this. The moment anyone rails about another’s grammatical errors she makes a whopper or two of her own or someone recalls a glorious error from the past.
Do as you will.
Blame Robert Crais (for why the WIR is late)
54 minutes ago